OPENOFFICE CALCULATE HOW TO

Moves the cursor to the top edge of the current data range. If the column to the right of the cell that contains the cursor is empty Moves the cursor to the right edge of the current data range. If the column to the left of the cell that contains the cursor is empty Moves the cursor to the left edge of the current data range. Moves the cursor to the last cell of the current row in a column containing data. Moves the cursor to the first cell of the current row. Moves the cursor to the last cell on the sheet that contains data. Perhaps I should rename one of the fields in the mysql database - it was never a problem in the original MS Access database though.Moves the cursor to the first cell in the sheet (A1). SELECT `transaction`.`UnitID`, SUM( `transaction`.`Rent` ), `unit`.`UnitID` AS `testing` FROM `snap`.`transaction` AS `transaction`, `snap`.`unit` AS `unit` WHERE ( `transaction`.`UnitID` = `unit`.`UnitID` ) AND ( ( `testing` = :link_from_UnitID ) ) GROUP BY `transaction`.`UnitID` The SQL command leading to this error is: I tried to fool it by using an alias for one of the UnitID fields, now I get the following error when I open the mainform: There doesn't seem to be a way for me to manually change the sql since the ellipses next to the Query are always grayed out. Could it have anything to do with the fact that I'm using mysql as the backend? For some reason it just doesn't like the two UnitID fields being the same, even though I have tried it with a simpler database (using Base's built in db) with just two tables and there it works. I double checked the query and the table.

OPENOFFICE CALCULATE HOW TO

It is just that I have to figure out how to the subform to sum only the ones related to the current record in the main form. Which means that the query is working correctly. The query I created (for use in the subform sums) gives me:Д¬ode: Select all Expand view Collapse view unit sum of col What steps could I take to check the correctness? Obviously, I must have gone wrong somewhere. I tried to add another subform at the mainfrm level and followed the approach as per your example. Yes, that's what I was trying to achieve. In other words: The main form has one subform showing all the records related to the currently selected main record and a second subform where the sum is shown for the corresponding grouped field(s). Villeroy wrote: I believe (I did not try) you can show all the subform-records related to the main form and show the sum of those records at the same time when you create a second subform bound to a sum-query, grouped by the same fields that are used for the link to the main form. Since 'Category1' and 'Category2' are unique pairs (GROUP BY), you always get a single result for any pair of 'Category1' and 'Category2'. It is set up so that every pair of 'Category1' and 'Category2' (table 'Data') in the master form shows all matching 'Category1' and 'Category2' of the subform (Query1'). The tiny wizard should explain best what it is about. Push one of the small buttons near the link-properties. This means that every combination of categories constitutes one row and the aggregates (SUM & Co) are built for each of them.Д«ack to the subform, there are 2 properties 'Link slave fields' and 'Link master fields'. It gets the contents from 'Query1' which is a synonym for:Д¬ode: Select all Expand view Collapse view SELECT 'Category1', 'Category2',ДЄVG( CAST ( 'Value' AS FLOAT ) ) AS 'Average' I will provide some screenshots if all this isn't clear enough yet. I'm not sure if I correctly configured the field (that will show the sum), which I added to a new subform using form navigator. it showed the total of that particular column, but of course it did this for all units. The query I created similar to the one used in your example did work, i.e. My main form contains a subform of the transaction table in table view and I can successfully navigate through all units and the transactions show correctly for each unit.

So a unit can have multiple of those transaction records. The transaction table contains some fields that I'd like to sum up. I have a table called Unit (with primary key UnitID) which has a 1-to-n relationship to a table transaction. I should have been more clear to my problem - the better the question, the better the answer I analyzed it and was trying to use the same approach in my db but I got stuck. That's the example I was referring to in my initial post. The example shows vertical aggregation results (sum, cound, min, max.) for every combination of categories in the main form (A_A, A_B, B_C.). Villeroy wrote: download/file.php?id=2950

Openoffice calculate